The Consequences of an Unsuccessful Strike on Iran’s Nuclear Sites

By Mathilda Ferguson

Mathilda Ferguson

Jun 23, 2025

The Great War - Rene Magritte (1964)

The Consequences of an Unsuccessful Strike on Iran’s Nuclear Sites

An Analysis:

—

Let us imagine that the act unfolds not with the thunder of destiny, but the brittle snap of a strained thread. An American President, cloaked in the mantle of authority yet operating beyond its constitutional weave, commands the release of bunker buster bombs upon Fordow — Iran’s underground nuclear site, and other facilities where atoms are coaxed into terrible potential. Congress, the deliberate assembly of the people's will, is bypassed; the ancient covenant of shared power, broken. And then, the second fracture: The program is not dismantled, merely inconvenienced. The real damage is to Iran’s freedom movements, which will be severely endangered.

—

I. Psychological

In America, a profound dissonance takes root. Americans feel anxious about what will come next, in this new war in the Middle East — a war they had no say in starting.

In Iran, the strike ignites a furnace of collective trauma and rage. The ancient Persian pride, already scarred by perceived Western arrogance, is flayed anew. The internal narrative of victimhood solidifies, welding the populace closer to the regime in shared defiance. The fear is visceral, transforming into a hardened resolve that makes future diplomacy a phoenix struggling to rise from toxic ash.

—

II. Sociological

American society fractures along fault lines already stressed. Supporters of the President cling fiercely to the proclaimed success, dismissing contradictory evidence as treachery. Opponents see tyranny confirmed. Civil discourse curdles into mutual suspicion. Families, communities, the very fabric of common understanding, are rent.

In Iran, the social contract tightens under siege. Dissent is drowned by the drumbeat of nationalism and survival. The regime leverages the attack to crush internal opposition, painting all critics as collaborators with the foreign aggressor. The strike becomes a crucible, forging unity through shared external threat, however manipulated.

—

III. Philosophical & Ethical

The act violates core tenets. The jus ad bellum principles of just war – legitimate authority, last resort, proportionality, reasonable chance of success – are trampled. No Congress, no true last resort explored, success a phantom. The lie compounds the sin, violating Kantian duty to truth and utilitarian harm principles; it poisons the well of democratic discourse.

Morally, it is the corruption of power unchecked: the end (a delayed, not destroyed, program) utterly fails to justify the catastrophic means and the betrayal of truth. It embodies the hubris of believing violence alone, wielded unilaterally and deceptively, can master the complex tapestry of geopolitics. It whispers the dangerous philosophy that security justifies the sacrifice of law and honesty.

—

IV. Historical

History will record this as a pivotal descent. It echoes the Gulf of Tonkin, the WMD intelligence failures – moments where deception or miscalculation ignited conflagrations. It marks a potential rupture in the American experiment, a precedent where Executive power shed its constitutional bridle for unilateral military action based on flawed premises and crowned with falsehood.

For Iran, it becomes another scar in the long narrative of foreign intervention, hardening their historical narrative of resistance against Western hegemony, fueling their drive for the ultimate deterrent – a nuclear weapon – seen now as the only guarantor against such strikes.

—

V. Freedom Movements in Iran

For Iran's brave protestors, yearning for freedom from theocratic oppression, the bombs falling on Fordow would gravely endanger their struggle for liberation. Overnight, their narrative is stolen. The regime, wounded but galvanized, wraps itself in the tattered flag of national martyrdom. State media screams of American aggression, drowning out internal dissent. The security apparatus crushes protests with renewed ferocity under the guise of "wartime unity." The complex tapestry of Iranian dissent – secular, reformist, women-led – is brutally simplified into "us vs. the foreign devil." Any nascent solidarity fractures; some nationalists reluctantly side with the regime against the external threat, while democrats are silenced or branded traitors. Psychologically, the hope nurtured through years of sacrifice is extinguished, replaced by despair and a hardened resolve born of siege mentality. History shows such external attacks rarely topple authoritarian regimes; they empower them. The Green Movement's dream fades further into the desert haze.

—

VI. Political

Domestically, impeachment drums beat, calls for investigations roar. However, the Republican elected officials are afraid of an authoritarian president and his supporters, they themselves had unleashed. The opposition mobilizes with righteous fury. The 2026 midterm election becomes a referendum on authoritarianism versus constitutional restoration.

Internationally, the damage is incalculable. NATO allies — although only behind closed doors — recoil in horror and distrust; the action was taken without consultation, and against international laws. Alliances fracture further. Global South nations see hypocrisy – the rules-based order shattered by its chief architect. The UN Security Council convenes in futile condemnation, its impotence laid bare.

—

VII. Economic & Financial

Chaos erupts. Oil prices skyrocket as Iran retaliates by possibly mining the Strait of Hormuz or attacking Gulf oil infrastructure (even if covertly). Global supply chains, already fragile, snap. Inflation, a lurking beast, is unleashed worldwide. Stock markets plunge. Sanctions on Iran are tightened, but reciprocal actions and global instability inflict pain far beyond Tehran. Recession becomes a very real possibility. The dollar's reserve status wobbles as trust in American stability erodes. The cost of the strike itself is dwarfed by the trillion-dollar repercussions of global economic dislocation.

—

VIII. Geopolitical

The Middle East transforms into a tinderbox. Iran intensifies its war with Israel and activates its proxies – Shia militias target U.S. forces in Iraq and Syria with renewed ferocity. Iran’s terrorist sleeper cells in the U.S. are activated. Israel faces greater existential threats in the war with Iran, and tries to draw the U.S. further into the military conflict. Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States tremble, caught between fear of Iran and distrust of a reckless U.S. Russia and China seize the opportunity: they condemn U.S. aggression while offering Iran political cover, advanced air defense systems, and accelerated nuclear cooperation (covert or overt), seeing a chance to diminish U.S. influence and fracture the West. Non-proliferation suffers a mortal blow; nations like Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Japan see the lesson: only a bomb guarantees security against a capricious superpower. A regional, then global, arms race will most likely ensue.

—

IX. Scientific

Beyond the immediate radioactive contamination risks (however contained Fordow might be, bunker busters create radioactive dust), the strike sets back global scientific cooperation. Joint research on nuclear safety, non-proliferation verification, even unrelated fields, freezes in distrust. Iranian scientists, driven by nationalistic fervor and renewed regime support, work with grim determination, their program now more diffuse, more hidden, and fueled by an iron will born of attack. The technical challenge of destroying deeply buried, dispersed facilities is starkly revealed – a lesson learned at terrible cost.

—

X. Legal

The action is a stark violation of the U.S. Constitution (War Powers Resolution), potentially constituting an impeachable offense and grounds for legal challenges. Internationally, it breaches the UN Charter (Article 2(4) - prohibition on force without Security Council authorization or self-defense). Iran pursues cases in international courts (ICJ), achieving symbolic victories that further isolate the U.S.

—

Conclusion: The Lingering Problems

The consequences are not a linear path but a spreading stain. It is the erosion of American democracy from within, the emboldenment of adversaries, the fracturing of alliances, the ignition of regional war, the crippling of the global economy, the death knell of non-proliferation, and the deep, enduring poisoning of truth itself.

The sands of Iran's nuclear hourglass were momentarily disturbed, only to settle again, flowing now with greater determination. The price paid was not for security, but for illusion and the reckless exercise of power.

The world is left not safer, but infinitely more perilous. The clock was not stopped by the bombs, only cruelly rewound, ticking now towards a darker, more uncertain hour.